A Short History of Photography

I thought Walter Benjamin's essay on the history of photography was very interesting and informative.  However, I think that the title of the essay is slightly misleading.  Referring to his essay as a short history of photography implies that Benjamin will present a factual timeline of the emergence of photography.  While he does offer this information, he also infuses his essay with value judgements about certain events.  He begins by describing a theological counter-argument against photography made by Leipzig.  In his analysis he uses derogatory diction such as "chauvinistic," "dullness," and his commentary is sarcastic towards religion.  He then goes on to praise the invention of photography saying that it captures images that a painter never could.  He supports this by saying that artist who used to paint portraits ultimately turned into photographers.  While Benjamin offers an insightful look at the historical and social relevance of photographs, it is a biased piece.