I am so confused. I didn't really like this essay because I was never too sure where it was going. I still don't get what Levine has done. Did she steal Walker Evans Photos and name them her own, in a fight because she's female? Was she trying to prove a point? Is that what rephotography is? Is it suddenly a different photograph, or interpreted differently once the artist is known to be female? "..Camouflaged as the search for rephotography, for a uniqueness that would protect both Evans and Levine by proving the original inimitable and the artist's hand unavoidable." Also Levine insists, "Because I am a woman, those images became a woman's work". I like the notion of the spectator playing an important part of the creative act, interpreting it in their own way. Does that make LEvine a spectator of her own work, since it's a copy of Walker's work? Is that where the mark idea comes into play?